From: stow@skyfox.usask.ca

Subject: RE: Intels pentium and FBI visits:anyone else??

Date: 16 DEC 94 17:38:26 GMT

>From: spatula@unicorn.dorm.umd.edu (Spatch)
>Date: 16-DEC-1994  04:29:44
>Description: Re: Intels pentium and FBI visits:anyone else??

>In article <3cq5pu$hvd@news.iastate.edu>,
>Kurt R Glaesemann <kurtg@iastate.edu> wrote:
>>Did anyone else receive a visit from the FBI reguarding posts about intel's
>>pentium, or am I alone.  Intel wanted me checked out, since I posted some
>>pro-consumer posts, without owning a pentium (that chip that can't do
>>division correctly some of the time).  I haven't figured out if it was
>>revenge, a scare tactic, or just plane stupidity on intels part, but it sure
>>makes then look dumb: calling the law in on a netnewsgroup.  I hope that
>>this doesn't lead to any self-censorship on the net.

>HAHAHA!  GOT YOU GOOD!!!

>That's the funniest troll I've done in YEARS!

>HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!  Even better than the "Melvin Purvis" scam a while back!
>Which one of you alt.stupidians owes me $5 now?!
*********************

Well "Spatch", if you think FBI visits - real, imaginary, or faked - are
something to joke about, you are obviously a frequent reader of that
"alt.stupidians" newsgroup.

If this whole thread is nothing but the result of an extremely stupid prank
of yours, you deserve a good swift kick in the nuts.



Rob Stow    rob.stow@usask.ca

DISCLAIMER:  The opinion expressed above is intelligent, articulate,
   accurate, and indisputable, and therefore should not in anyway be
   construed as being representative of my employer's opinions.



From: spatula@unicorn.dorm.umd.edu (Spatch)

Subject: Re: Intels pentium and FBI visits:anyone else??

Date: 17 Dec 1994 00:11:27 -0500

In article <16DEC94.17382634@skyfox.usask.ca>,  <stow@skyfox.usask.ca> wrote:
>
>Well "Spatch", if you think FBI visits - real, imaginary, or faked - are
>something to joke about, you are obviously a frequent reader of that
>"alt.stupidians" newsgroup.
>
>If this whole thread is nothing but the result of an extremely stupid prank
>of yours, you deserve a good swift kick in the nuts.

	You know, I've been on the net for quite a while now.  Seen a lot
of things happen, a lot of changes made.  I've seen grown men reduced to
tears by a simple set of keystrokes.  I've witnessed mass trollings, Great
Renamings, turkey trotting, I've seen love blossom and hate flourish.
I've seen bacon smoked, Kibo grepped, and a certain pair of lawyers incite
and anger many.  I've watched a.s.t attacks, seen Babs Abernathy's
middle-finger castle .sig too many times, I watched in helpless horror
as Rhodes Scholars everywhere discover a secret to MAKE.MONEY.FAST.
	I've gone from a small Apple 2c computer with green monochrome monitor
and 2400 baud modem to a 486sx and a 14.4 connection (so sue me if I'm not
up to your times yet, boys.)  During the days when 
alt.sweedish.chef.bork.bork.bork was considered an original way of naming
a newsgroup, I was there.  During Dan Gannon's rants on soc.college, I was
there.  During the midwest flooding, I was there.
 
	And sometimes, during the tumult and the chaos, I sit back and
stare at the screen, and wonder, "is it all really worth it?"  And then I
see a post, a post not unlike yours, who HBT, hook, line, and sinker, and
I sit back, open another Rugged Hill Amber Ale, and nod... yes, it's
definitely worth it.

	Thank you, stow@skyfox, for making us laugh at life -- again.



(oh, and by the way, I believe the newsgroup you're referring to is
alt.stupidity.  Hope this helps.)
-- 
tv's Spatch, MD PhD PMS XYZ PDQ - Will make culinary references for food
This Green Card .sig is here to piss off Canter and Siegel.
Check out the Spatula Homepage!  All new, all cool!  http:// ... uh,
http:// oh, wait.  I don't have a homepage.  Just remembered.  Sorry.



Jesper Nilsson // dat92jni@ludat.lth.se or jesper@df.lth.se